Flexibility in the UI on Field naming (vs consistency in data/reporting)

Beantwoord

Fleur van Bladel

30 mei 2023 07:13

Problem: Reporting flexibility (the more userfriendly (=longer most of the time) we make the fieldnames, the harder it is to create reporting (via oData and PowerBI mostly). Also changing fieldnames creates a lot of rework in PowerQuery.

 

Why? having fixed fields AND non fixed fields provides flexibility in how we visualize it towards users and (viewing) stakeholders

 

What? 

• questionnaires should have a fixed 'name' and a non fixed to use in the UI (longer names that reflect more to.....on explanation or definition f.e.)
• grouping or explanation fields that only can be used in the UI (in addition to the mouse-over function of fields)

1

• Officiële opmerking

  

  Nisha Haridas

  11 september 2023 13:44

  Dear Fleur van Bladel 
   

  We are planning update our reporting system , however your request has been noted and added to our backlog for future consideration given other planned priorities. Feel free to reach out if you have further questions. Have a nice day!
• 

  Fleur van Bladel

  30 mei 2023 07:14

  Request was submitted by Leiden University

  0

U moet u aanmelden om een opmerking te plaatsen.